<i>'Festina Lente’</i>: The ILO and EU Agendas on the Digital Transformation of Work

This article compares the International Labour Organization (ILO) and European Union (EU) agendas concerning digital transformation of work, addresses possible policy gaps their implications for international EU labour law. It critically reviews current social acquis both institutions concentrates on key analogies between ILO’s Centenary Declaration Future Work some various regulatory initiatives taken by in context Pillar Social Rights. The finds that, despite often articulated calls urgent original measures, institutions’ programmes present largely a prudent continuation traditional narratives, failing to strengthen adequacy existing regulation regimes. Besides predominantly non-binding nature, efficacy most future-oriented instruments is profoundly undermined unreasonable exclusion those workers who bear brunt disparities accelerated digitalization casualization work. In addition, implementation these may be jeopardized complex governance methods unresolved tensions conflicting approaches objectives. study concludes although positive signs are emerging supranational legal order, much remains done address multifarious challenges arising from transformation. Organization, Union, Law, Digital Transformation, Platform Work, Policy, Regulation